—
the architecture of self → musing no. 101
the architecture of trust → musing no. 90
the architecture of control → musing no. 74
—
and lastly, the podcasts are the raw intimate audio layer that adds depth to the long-form content. subscribe and follow wherever you listen to your podcasts.
—
i think most men misunderstand safety.
i know i did.
when men hear the word “safety,” i think we tend to imagine it in the most literal, one-dimensional way possible.
physical safety.
a dark alley at three in the morning.
walking through the wrong neighborhood.
being somewhere alone where something could happen.
but the truth is, most men move through most of their lives without having to seriously calculate their physical safety.
—
most women don’t have that luxury.
where she is.
who’s there.
how late it is.
where she parked.
who’s walking behind her.
whether the man she’s with is actually the man she thinks he is.
i don’t think most men understand how exhausting that must be.
and i definitely didn’t understand what any of it had to do with intimacy.
i do now.
—
because safety isn’t just the absence of danger.
it’s the ability to stop protecting yourself.
for her, that might mean being able to relax around you.
her nervous system gets to quiet.
she doesn’t have to constantly read your mood or calculate which version of you is about to walk through the door.
she can lower her guard because she trusts that the man beside her isn’t going to become someone else the moment something goes wrong.
and if she can’t do that, i don’t know how you build much of anything else on top of it.
but there’s another side of safety that i understand much more personally.
what safety feels like to a man.
—
because while most men aren’t wondering whether the woman beside them can physically overpower them, that doesn’t mean we aren’t asking whether it’s safe to expose ourselves to her.
men spend most of their lives performing.
be the strong guy.
the successful guy.
the funny guy.
the confident guy.
the guy with the answer.
the guy who can fix it.
the guy who doesn’t need anything.
the guy who can take the hit and keep moving.
whatever the performance is, most of us learn one.
and eventually you want one person in the world you don’t have to perform for.
—
you want to come home, put all of it down, and just be.
i had that wrong too.
because during my marriage, i learned what happens when you believe you’ve found that safety and then discover you haven’t.
my ex-wife was a dirty fighter.
when something didn’t go her way, she knew exactly where to go.
my underbelly.
things i had told her privately.
insecurities.
fears.
feelings.
things that hurt.
things i had trusted her enough to disclose because she was my wife.
and when she was angry, some of those things became weapons.
—
there’s something uniquely painful about that.
a stranger can insult you.
someone who barely knows you can try to hurt you.
but they don’t know where to aim.
the person you love does.
they know where every soft spot is because you showed them.
and that’s what made it so devastating for me.
it wasn’t simply what was said during an argument.
it was knowing that the person who was supposed to be beside me, the person who was supposed to love me, could deliberately reach for something i had trusted her with because she knew it would hurt.
—
eventually, something changed in me.
when she got angry, instead of thinking about whatever we were actually fighting about, i started wondering:
what is she going to attack me with now?
how badly is she going to try to hurt me?
i couldn’t recover from that.
because once i knew my vulnerability could become ammunition, vulnerability stopped feeling safe.
and without realizing it, i started protecting myself again.
—
that’s the part of emotional safety between men and women that i don’t think we talk about enough.
for a man, safety isn’t simply having a woman who asks him to open up.
it’s knowing what she’ll do with what comes out when he does.
can i tell you i’m scared?
can i tell you i don’t know?
can i tell you where i’m insecure?
can i fail in front of you?
can i hurt?
can i stop being impressive for five fucking minutes?
and after i’ve shown you all of that—
will you protect what you now know about me?
—
because intimacy gives another person extraordinary access.
the closer someone gets to you, the more precisely they can hurt you.
they know the insecurity.
they know the fear.
they know the wound.
they know the thing you secretly worry might actually be true about yourself.
—
safety isn’t pretending the person you love doesn’t have that weapon.
it’s trusting them not to pick it up.
and maybe that’s where safety becomes the first component in the architecture of intimacy.
because for her, safety might mean finally being able to lower her guard.
for him, it might mean finally being able to drop the performance.
different experiences.
same fundamental question:
what happens to me when i become vulnerable in your presence?
because vulnerability without safety isn’t intimacy.
it’s exposure.
—
most people never test that difference on purpose.
they find out by accident.
mid-argument, when the thing they confided six months ago
gets thrown back across the room.
mid-silence, three years in, quietly realizing
they stopped telling him the real answer
and can’t remember when.
—
by then it’s not a musing.
it’s already been decided.
the mechanism — what actually determines whether someone
is safe with what you give them, and how to tell
before you find out the hard way —
is inside rr.68.
not next time it comes up.
now, while you can still use the answer instead of just surviving it.
— author
p.s. the cuffed shop —
books. prints. music. coaching.
the architecture of intimacy print + digital file are now available.
p.p.s. the architecture of intimacy has officially launched.
subscribe so you do not miss a single word.
this isn’t the only thing we made.