women’s protection: the quiet sisterhood behind cuffed | musing no. 45

the women who disliked her weren’t being petty — they were protecting what she almost ruined.

i didn’t expect cuffed to become what it is now.

if you’d told me a year ago that our audience would skew heavily female, i probably would’ve laughed.

but here we are.

and they all have one thing in common —

they cannot stand dabatha.

that part still makes me smile. because what started as a personal experience somehow turned into a mirror for thousands of women who recognized her type instantly. the kind of woman who plays with vulnerability like it’s currency, who takes what’s sacred and treats it like content.

but here’s where it gets interesting.

every time a woman messages me to call out dabatha’s immaturity or selfishness, the conversation always pivots.

almost like clockwork.

they start worrying about me.

they hope her behavior didn’t harden me.

that i don’t lose my romantic nature or the way i think about intimacy.

that i don’t become cynical or emotionally unavailable.

and they always phrase it the same way —

not “for me.”

but “for other women.”

that’s the part that stopped me.

these messages aren’t coming from single women looking to connect.

most are happily married, in long-term relationships, or raising families.

they’re not trying to shoot their shot. they’re trying to preserve something they believe still matters —

men who feel deeply, lead softly, and love with both presence and discipline.

it’s like they’ve recognized how rare emotional depth has become, and they don’t want to see one more good man become another casualty of bitterness.

because when the good ones give up,

the next woman pays for it.

that’s the real story here —

the quiet sisterhood forming beneath the surface.

women protecting other women by protecting the few men who still move differently.

they’re not defending me from dabatha.

they’re defending what i represent: a refusal to let modern cynicism replace depth, or irony replace honesty.

if you’ve read *the flinch (m.18)*, you saw the first crack in that armor.

if you remember *the shift (m.20)*, she peaked at 25 and he has more options at 45 because he built value.

and in *standing in the fire (m.28)*, you saw what it costs to stay open when the world tells you to close.

those pieces weren’t just about heartbreak.

they were about what happens when love meets conscience — when men learn that the cost of staying soft in a hard world is still worth paying.

the women who write in about dabatha understand that instinctively.

they dislike her not out of jealousy or competition, but because she’s the kind of woman who breaks the emotional economy for everyone else.

they’ve lived through their own versions of her.

they’ve loved men who were still bleeding from women like her.

so when they tell me not to change,

it’s not flattery.

it’s protection.

a quiet plea to keep believing in connection,

because they know what it costs the next woman if i don’t.

that’s what real sisterhood looks like.

not hashtags or photo ops.

but women you’ll never meet, quietly looking out for you by looking out for each other.

and it reminded me of something simple:

most of the strength we overlook in women isn’t loud.

it’s protective.

it’s the kind that guards what’s rare without needing credit for it.

when women protect men like that,

they’re really protecting each other.

— author

if you’re new here, start with *the flinch (m.18)*, *the shift (m.20)*, and *standing in the fire (m.28)* — they’re the spine of this story.

you’ll understand why this one hit so hard.

subscribe to **cuffed** to get every new musing early, and explore **the cuffed toolkit** — a handpicked collection of everything we actually use, from books to tools that sharpen your presence.

because connection starts with awareness.

[subscribe] | [follow] | [explore the cuffed toolkit]